Read about Katherine Parr or Jane Grey, and you’ll soon come across the statement, in various guises, that when Jane Grey came to live with Katherine Parr, Katherine gave Jane the maternal nurturing of which she had been deprived. It was then, the story usually goes on, that Jane first found acceptance of her intellectual gifts. Katherine Parr’s death, the story dolefully concludes, was therefore not only a tragedy for Katherine but for Jane, who was returned to her dreadful parents and consigned once again to a life of misery.
As with so many aspects of Jane Grey’s story, fiction in this instance has heavily intruded upon fact.
First, as Leanda de Lisle has pointed out, the story that the nine-year-old Jane was part of Katherine Parr’s household in 1546 and was a witness to Katherine Parr’s famous confrontation with Henry VIII following Katherine’s learning of her imminent arrest is a product of Victorian confusion of “Lady Lane” with “Lady Jane.” The passage in question, as reported by John Foxe, places Lady Lane, not Lady Jane, at the scene: “And so first cōmaundyng her Ladyes to conuey away their bookes, which were agaynst the law, the next night folowyng after supper, shee (wayted upon only by the Lady Harbert her sister and the Lady Lane, who caried the candell before her) went vnto the kynges bead chamber, whom she found sittyng and talkyng with certeine Gentlemē of his chamber.” Nothing places Jane Grey in Katherine Parr’s court during Henry VIII’s reign, though her mother, Frances, was among the queen’s ladies and might have brought young Jane to visit at court from time to time. (When Frances’s widower, Adrian Stokes, died, a portrait of Katherine Parr was among his household furnishings. If this came from Frances, perhaps she herself had been fond of the queen.)
Second, it is often forgotten that Jane was not Katherine Parr’s ward: she was Thomas Seymour’s. According to the deposition of Jane’s father, Henry Grey, then Marquis of Dorset, Seymour approached him shortly after Henry VIII’s death to propose that Jane be put into his care so that Seymour could promote Jane’s marriage to the young Edward VI. Dorset, having agreed to Seymour’s proposal, sent for Jane, “who remained in [Seymour’s] house from that time continually until the death of the Queen.” Susan James, one of Parr’s biographers, has suggested that Jane remained at Thomas’s house at Seymour Place even after Seymour’s marriage to Katherine Parr became public and that she did not join the queen’s household until after the Lady Elizabeth left it in May 1548. This may be the case; there is certainly no mention of Jane’s presence in the accounts of the sexually charged horseplay between Seymour and Elizabeth, and Jane never gave a deposition about the relations of Seymour and the princess when Seymour later fell from grace. On the other hand, it seems more likely that once Seymour and Katherine made their marriage public, Jane would have spent at least some time with the rest of the “family”–Seymour, Katherine, and the Lady Elizabeth–at Chelsea and Hanworth instead of remaining constantly at Seymour Place.
In early 1548, after Elizabeth’s tutor died, Elizabeth succeeded in getting Roger Ascham appointed as her new tutor. It may have been then that Jane made the acquaintance of Ascham, who would visit her at Bradgate several years later and record their meeting for posterity.
Sadly, while we know little of Jane’s relationship with Katherine during the queen’s life, we do know that Jane served as chief mourner at Katherine’s funeral: “Then, the Lady Jane, daughter to the lord Marquis [of] Dorset, chief mourner, led by a[n] estate, her train borne up by a young lady.” This may be a sign that Jane and Katherine had become close; on the other hand, it may simply be that Jane was chosen for the role because she was the highest-ranking lady available on relatively short notice.
There is one intriguing hint of a close relationship between Katherine and Jane, however: the prayer book that Jane carried to the scaffold. Janel Mueller, who has published a scholarly edition of Katherine’s writings, believes that the prayer book is in Katherine’s handwriting and that it was therefore created by the queen herself. Mueller posits that the prayer book was given as a keepsake by the queen to Jane, although if it was indeed Katherine Parr’s, it is also possible that Thomas Seymour, to whom Katherine left all of her goods, gave it to Jane.
It is certainly probable that the queen and Jane, both of whom enjoyed intellectual pursuits, found pleasure in each other’s company and that Jane admired and respected the queen. Probable–but not recorded. The bare facts above are all that is known about Jane’s relationship with Katherine Parr. The rest of the oft-told tale–that in Katherine’s care, Jane found happiness for the first time in her young life, that Katherine’s encouragement helped Jane to blossom as a scholar, that Katherine became a mother figure to Jane, that Jane was unhappy to return home–is romantic embroidery, perfectly reasonable in fiction but irritating when it intrudes itself into nonfiction.
Eric Ives: Lady Jane Grey: A Tudor Mystery
Susan James, Kateryn Parr: The Making of a Queen
Leanda de Lisle: The Sisters Who Would Be Queen
Janel Mueller, ed., Katherine Parr: Complete Works and Correspondence
Linda Porter: Katherine the Queen: The Remarkable Life of Katherine Parr
P. F. Tytler, England under the Reigns of Edward VI and Mary
11 thoughts on “Jane Grey and Katherine Parr”
‘Poor Jane’ stories seem to abound. Personally, I am rather sick of them. But I think she is an excellent subject for beatification considering her youth, her manner of death, etc.
Yes, she certainly is!
I just started your new book, “Her Highness the Traitor,” so am not going to read this post (spoiler?) but bookmark it for after I finish. I’m thoroughly enjoying reading about the Greys, Dudleys and Catherine Parr… thanks!
I agree that the “poor Jane” stories are overly numerous … some of the letters quoted by Ives should be required reading! I also think that she and Catherine Parr had a great deal in common.
Yes, it’s a pity we don’t know more about their relationship!
I’ve just been to Sudeley castle, where there is a big exhibition on Katherine Parr because it’s the 500th anniversary of her birth. Both David Starkey and Alison Weir will present lectures there. There is a strong emphasis on Katherine’s influence on both Jane and Elizabeth. She must have had a great deal of influence, IMO – she had acted as Regent for Henry VIII and showed a woman could rule, she was the first English woman to publish a book under her own name, and the fact that these books were based on her religious studies, shows her to have that in common with both Jane and Elizabeth.
I certainly do believe Katherine was a figure that Jane would have admired and looked up to. I hope you took some pictures of the exhibit to post on your blog!
I had always thought that Jane was very influenced by the dowager queen. Yes, she was the ward of Thomas Seymour, but I tend to think that while at Sudeley she must have connected with the queen. I have read in some places that Lady Jane was used as a surrogate daughter [which I know is untrue.] I also went to Sudeley this summer and was touched by the display in the Chapel and the video that explored Lady Jane. So my question would be is that all that the queen did to contribute to Jane’s life and who she became? She did end up as chief mourner; how did they go about picking the chief mourner back then?
Thanks, TudorQueen! I do think it’s likely Catherine had influence over Jane, just not as great as some historians would suggest. Jane’s own father was a patron of scholars and a man of strong Protestant beliefs–I think his influence over Jane tends to be underestimated.
Chief mourners were the same gender as the deceased, but otherwise as far as I can tell, there weren’t any hard-and-fast criteria for choosing them, except that a high-ranking person would have a high-ranking chief mourner as well. Frances was her mother’s chief mourner, and her sister Eleanor was Catherine of Aragon’s chief mourner. I certainly think it was possible that Jane was chosen because she was close to the queen, but her social status would have been important as well.
Pingback: O relacionamento de Lady Jane Grey e Catarina Parr | O Diário de Ana Bolena
Comments are closed.