Much to the frustration of the historical novelist who chooses Henry Stafford, Duke of Buckingham, as a main character, few of his records survive. Many records were destroyed in 1483, where the Vaughan family raided Brecon Castle after Henry left it for his ill-fated rebellion against Richard III, and more were destroyed by Welsh rebels after Henry VII came to the throne in 1485.
Here, however, is a transcription of one letter by Henry that’s held at the Staffordshire Record Office. No smoking guns here, folks (no “My well beloved Richard. I have taken care of the business in the Tower that you asked me to. Repairs will be needed to the staircase now. Now do I get my Bohun lands?”) Rather, this is simply a letter to an unknown recipient who apparently had claimed an interest in some of Henry’s lands:
Welbeloved in oure hartie maner we grete you wele And
wheras you make clayme to our Manors of Penshurst and
Yensfeld with other landes comprised in your bill which we
with our counsaile at your instance have herd and examined
We do you to wite that seing our father whom god assayle
long before the bargein made betwene us and Syr Will[ia]m
Sutton had the said Manors by letters patentes of King
Henry conteyning clause of warrantye We ar not advised
to make you enny further aunswere untill the king and
his counsaile be made prevye to the title that in case it be
found for you we maye have satisfacc[i]on in value of his
graces lands otherwhere And in the mean tyme we requyre
you to quiet your self ffrom London the xxti daie of Julye
Penshurst and Yensfield had been granted to Henry’s grandfather, Humphrey Stafford, first Duke of Buckingham, by Henry VI in 1447, after the death of their previous owner, Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester, so it’s not clear to me on what grounds the recipient made his claim. Evidently, Henry himself was not impressed. In 1519, however, Henry’s son Edward Stafford, the third Duke of Buckingham, wrote a letter to Sir Edward Chamberlain in which he acknowledged Chamberlain’s claim to Penshurst and other manors in Kent and stated that his council had agreed to offer Chamberlain some recompense. Perhaps the Chamberlain claim is related to the one made against Henry years before.
One interesting point about Henry’s letter is its signature, shown in the first picture below. Compare it to the second signature, taken from the famous fragment that contains the signatures and mottoes of Edward V, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, and Henry. In the “three signatures” document, Harry seems to have added his first name “Harre” almost as an afterthought.
6 thoughts on “A Letter From Henry, Duke of Buckingham”
Susan, the absence of records can be as much an opportunity as a threat!
People could claim lands for all sorts of crazy reasons. Helen Castor’s work on the Pastons is good on this. I think half the time they were just trying to get what lawyers call ‘nuisance payments’ as a settlement was often cheaper and easier than dragging a case through the common law courts.
What a signature…extraordinary!
That is one cool signature! it’s a good job though that he never had to do any book signings – he would have been there forever!
Brian, so true! All sorts of fun I could be having with him, with no pesky records to contradict me!
Ms.Lucy and Lady D, that is some signature, isn’t it? No wonder he wasn’t very active during Edward IV’s reign–he probably had to go to bed and rest for an hour each time he signed a document.
With the second signature, it looks almost as if he’s trying to put a little pair of spectacles on his “g.”
Whoops–I guess it’s the “m” wearing the spectacles.
Lol, that’s the sort of decorated scribbles I’ve produced during boring lessons sometimes. 🙂
Comments are closed.